Regulation

Checklist: Assess 1,4‑Dioxane Risk in Surfactant-Heavy Cleaning Formulas

Checklist: Assess 1,4‑Dioxane Risk in Surfactant-Heavy Cleaning Formulas

If your formula leans on ethoxylated surfactants, you have a credible risk of trace 1,4‑dioxane—a solvent-like process byproduct—ending up in the finished product. Here’s a practical, certification‑ready workflow: map your surfactant classes, set supplier specs, validate with a headspace GC‑MS method that can reliably hit your target limit of quantitation, and document controls aligned with federal TSCA oversight and state ppm limits. This checklist walks you through regulatory guardrails, lab methods that hold up under scrutiny, and formulation choices that avoid the problem at the source, so you can ship compliant cleaners with transparent claims and a low‑waste procurement story. Cleaning Supply Review favors lab‑defensible steps and procurement clarity; the guidance below reflects that approach.

Read more →

How to Verify Cleaning Formulations Meet Safer Soap Act Standards

How to Verify Cleaning Formulations Meet Safer Soap Act Standards

Verifying that a cleaning formulation meets Safer Soap Act–style standards starts with two things: official registry checks and defensible lab evidence. In practice, you’ll map what the product is (soap, detergent, or antimicrobial), screen its full ingredient list against trusted lists, and confirm low-residue performance with targeted testing. Then you validate labels and claims—especially anything implying disinfection—and compile an auditable dossier. This Cleaning Supply Review guide provides a step-by-step, standards-based roadmap to verify Safer Soap Act compliance for cleaning formulations using EPA Safer Choice, the SCIL list, GreenScreen Certified, GHS labeling, FIFRA registration, and cleaning validation methods.

Read more →